counter Bob! You’re going to have to learn : MGx – Musings, Essays & Ballads

About the Author

author photo

When my oldest son, a Marine, left for war and crossed the border from Kuwait into Iraq in March 2003 I started writing my conscience. After two tours that young combat veteran, my first born son, is now permanently disabled suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and his mother is now an ardent peace activist. Today I am active with Veterans for Peace, Military Families Speak Out and on the board of Rural Organizing Project Also, I am CEO of Rogue River Wind, Ltd and the inventor of a low profile wind turbine incorporating a high bandwidth relativistic generator

See All Posts by This Author

Bob! You’re going to have to learn

img_0154So spoke a cor­nered Nikki Whitty to incom­ing county com­mis­sioner, Bob Main, this morn­ing as Whitty was sur­rounded by for­mer county road work­ers. Speak­ing with a dozen road work­ers ques­tion­ing her vote to ter­mi­nate 22 of 39 road main­te­nance employ­ees, Whitty, advised that Bob Main had specif­i­cally requested not to be made a liai­son to either his pre­vi­ous assessor’s office or the road depart­ment. Main denied hav­ing declined the road depart­ment assign­ment when Whitty con­fronted him in the hall­way out­side the com­mis­sion­ers’ offices.

Bob! You’re going to have to learn,” snapped a clearly annoyed Whitty as she marched back to her office and accused Main of ‘chang­ing his tune’ to anx­ious road depart­ment personnel.

One has to ask what it is Bob is sup­posed to learn. Not to dis­agree with her in pub­lic? To back her up no mat­ter what? Only answer ques­tions the way she wants him too?

The occa­sion was the most highly attended swear­ing in cer­e­mony for elected offi­cials that County Clerk, Terri Turi can remem­ber. The cer­e­mony was orig­i­nally planned for the county cham­bers but was soon over­whelmed by the num­bers and moved to the jury room upstairs where it was still filled to capacity.

Bob Main’s swear­ing in was met by a huge round of applause espe­cially by the dozen or so road work­ers so dev­as­tated by the 11th hour lay­offs on New Year’s Eve. Road work­ers had hoped to speak with both Stuffle­bean and Whitty and ask to see a road mas­ter plan or the analy­sis Stuffle­bean referred show­ing the 600+ miles of county road can be maintained.

Main had been shut out of the delib­er­a­tions and the exec­u­tive ses­sion where the board voted to ter­mi­nate 60% of the road crew. Today, Whitty claimed that she was respon­si­ble for hold­ing the vote before Main took office so as to spare him this tur­moil. Whitty fur­ther claimed that Stuffle­bean, self appointed interim Road Mas­ter had the author­ity to ter­mi­nate the employ­ees with­out board approval but was doing the board a ser­vice by keep­ing them informed.

The actual sav­ings to the county from pay­ing unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits vs reg­u­lar salaries between the ter­mi­na­tion date of Jan­u­ary 20 and the labor con­tract of July 1 is less than $300,000, how­ever, the tax payer will not likely see any sav­ings as peo­ple will have to be hired or pri­vate con­tract­ing firms brought in to do the work the road crew would nor­mally be doing.

Obvi­ously there is much more to report and I am going to orga­nize what I have learned the last few days and report on this fur­ther as will The Sen­tinel. It should be noted that almost a dozen of the for­mer employ­ees reside in or near Coquille… the local unem­ploy­ment rate just went up.

Share and Enjoy:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

There Are 2 Responses So Far. »

  1. MY HAT IS OFF TO YOU ALL !!!

    It’s hard to speak to power, but harder still to do noth­ing. WE THE PEOPLE tell them what we want, not the other way around ! This county is finally being made to answer to US !!

    I salute those of you will­ing to stand up and demand answers.

    Your jobs and your fam­i­lies deserve noth­ing less.

  2. The recent deci­sion of the County Board of Com­mis­sion­ers to lay­off 22 employ­ees of that depart­ment con­cerns me very much. I worked for the County Road Depart­ment for 33 years, the last seven years as the County Road­mas­ter before resigning.

    I won­der how much thought went into this deci­sion as to the effects it will have on pub­lic safety and main­te­nance on our county roads. The remain­ing 17 employ­ees can­not effec­tively main­tain the 500 miles of aging county road. It was dif­fi­cult to main­tain our roads the way we should when we had 60 employ­ees. Many of these roads do not meet today’s county road stan­dards and were con­structed only for a cer­tain need, which poses many main­te­nance prob­lems for the county.

    There’s always room for improve­ment in any orga­ni­za­tion. While Road­mas­ter I had to make deci­sions that were unpop­u­lar to the pub­lic and employ­ees of the Road Depart­ment, but were nec­es­sary to keep pace with the cur­rent polit­i­cal and eco­nomic times. I enjoyed work­ing for the pub­lic and val­ued our employ­ees and the ser­vice they pro­vided, know­ing we could respond quickly to most emer­gency sit­u­a­tions involv­ing county roads and we did. Gut­ting the High­way Depart­ment will change this.

    Of the 17 jobs remain­ing, 3 are man­age­ment posi­tions, 2 lead­men and 1 bridge inspec­tor. This leaves 11 remain­ing posi­tions to per­form rou­tine road main­te­nance. Vaca­tion, sick leave, fam­ily leave and train­ing will reduce that num­ber even lower. Of the 22 employ­ees laid off, the county will lose all of their expe­ri­enced grader oper­a­tors, all of the paving crew and the crusher crew. Most crews require 3 to 6 employ­ees to work safely on pub­lic roads, more if trucks are needed. Do the math. Very lit­tle work will be accom­plished unless out­side help is hired. Has this extra cost been con­sid­ered and what will it cost the county?

    Any of these jobs require expe­ri­ence and train­ing over a period of time. Who’s going to train the remain­ing employ­ees to do these jobs and what qual­ity of work will be done? I see many prob­lems with this deci­sion, too many to address here in this forum. Unless I’m totally igno­rant or there is a hid­den agenda that’s not being fully dis­closed, it doesn’t compute.

    It seems that the elected offi­cials who made this deci­sion, have cho­sen to dis­re­gard pub­lic safety and the impacts it will have to our county road sys­tem. It also seems that there is a lack of under­stand­ing on the many issues involv­ing the county road depart­ment and its impor­tance to the cit­i­zens of Coos County. The county road sys­tem is more than just a bud­get fig­ure, the pub­lic should have some input on such a major deci­sion that impacts them so directly.

Post a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.