counter Fighting back against media smears and defamation : MGx – Musings, Essays & Ballads

About the Author

author photo

When my oldest son, a Marine, left for war and crossed the border from Kuwait into Iraq in March 2003 I started writing my conscience. After two tours that young combat veteran, my first born son, is now permanently disabled suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and his mother is now an ardent peace activist. Today I am active with Veterans for Peace, Military Families Speak Out and on the board of Rural Organizing Project Also, I am CEO of Rogue River Wind, Ltd and the inventor of a low profile wind turbine incorporating a high bandwidth relativistic generator

See All Posts by This Author

Fighting back against media smears and defamation

It seems the some­what lib­eral view held by the more par­ti­san side of the news/infotainment/media regard­ing ‘free speech’ is going to be tested. Free speech does not guar­an­tee the right to ‘hate speech’ par­tic­u­larly with the intent to do harm or the right to mis­in­form and now the White House is fight­ing back against Fox News.

the con­flict had been mostly a one-sided affair, with Fox News hosts pro­mot­ing tax day “tea par­ties” that focused protest on the new pres­i­dent, and more recently bring­ing down the pres­i­den­tial adviser Van Jones through rugged cov­er­age that caught the admin­is­tra­tion, and other news orga­ni­za­tions, off guard. Dur­ing the health care debate, Fox News has put a mega­phone to oppo­nents, some of whom have advanced far-fetched the­o­ries about the impact of reform. And even far­ther out on the edge, the network’s most vis­i­ble star of the moment, Glenn Beck, has said the pres­i­dent has “a deep-seated hatred for white people.”

Admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials seemed to have decided that they had had enough.

“We’re going to treat them the way we would treat an oppo­nent,” Anita Dunn, the White House com­mu­ni­ca­tions direc­tor, said in an inter­view with The New York Times. “As they are under­tak­ing a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don’t need to pre­tend that this is the way that legit­i­mate news orga­ni­za­tions behave.”

About time the White House called out Fox News’ legit­i­macy as a news orga­ni­za­tion although it should be noticed since the net­work has been attack­ing Obama rat­ings have increased 20%. Appar­ently, irre­spon­si­ble jour­nal­ism sells.

Speak­ing of irre­spon­si­ble, Rush Lim­baugh is also under fire by Al Sharpton

This feud started after the recent announce­ment that Lim­baugh was a part of a group of investors inter­ested in buy­ing the NFL’s St. Louis Rams. Lim­baugh was dropped from the group after an ensu­ing firestorm in which some play­ers, team own­ers and NFL hon­chos said they were against Lim­baugh, whom some accused of mak­ing racially insen­si­tive statements.

Sharp­ton, how­ever, was along for the ride. The Harlem agi­ta­tor took advan­tage of the news to demand that Lim­baugh drop his mem­ber­ship to the all-white Ever­glades Club in Palm Beach.

Con­tro­versy boosts rat­ings and clearly many of these provo­ca­teurs will aban­don jour­nal­is­tic ethics and shame­lessly mis­lead their read­ers, view­ers and lis­ten­ers for adver­tis­ing money. Tak­ing them on in court may be the only way to apply the brakes to the ‘hate speech’ ped­dlers of free speech. On the other hand, why give them any cre­dence at all? Why engage them as if they are legit­i­mate media when they clearly are not?

Per­haps it is best to ignore them, just like our local provo­ca­teurs and Lim­baugh wanna be’s, and just step over them like a pile of dog poop on the side­walk and con­tinue on your way. Step­ping in it is just plain icky.

.

Share and Enjoy:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

Post a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.