counter Measures 66 & 67 pass : MGx – Musings, Essays & Ballads

About the Author

author photo

When my oldest son, a Marine, left for war and crossed the border from Kuwait into Iraq in March 2003 I started writing my conscience. After two tours that young combat veteran, my first born son, is now permanently disabled suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and his mother is now an ardent peace activist. Today I am active with Veterans for Peace, Military Families Speak Out and on the board of Rural Organizing Project Also, I am CEO of Rogue River Wind, Ltd and the inventor of a low profile wind turbine incorporating a high bandwidth relativistic generator

See All Posts by This Author

& 67 pass">Measures 66 & 67 pass

Despite lack­lus­ter sup­port here on the South Coast, the tax equity mea­sures passed by almost 9 points

Cam­paign ads by sup­port­ers high­lighted banks and credit card com­pa­nies and showed images of well-dressed peo­ple step­ping off pri­vate jets. They also ham­mered on the $10 min­i­mum tax that most cor­po­ra­tions have paid since its incep­tion in 1931.

Those mes­sages helped counter warn­ings by oppo­nents that the taxes would lead to job losses, wors­en­ing the state’s 11 per­cent unem­ploy­ment rate, and prompt wealthy res­i­dents to move elsewhere.

They did a great job of pound­ing, ‘It’s only $10,’” said Bob Tier­nan, chair­man of the state Repub­li­can Party. “We got swamped by the union money.”

Sup­port­ers spent at least $6.9 mil­lion, most of it com­ing from teacher and pub­lic employee unions. Oppo­nents, led by a coali­tion of busi­ness orga­ni­za­tions, spent at least $4.6 mil­lion, donated by wealthy entre­pre­neurs such as Nike’s Phil Knight and Colum­bia Sportswear’s Tim Boyle. Oppo­nents who gath­ered at the Grand Hotel in Salem were opti­mistic early, but as the results came in, the mood quickly darkened.

For a county by county analy­sis, look here

Share and Enjoy:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

There Are 2 Responses So Far. »

  1. The tied has turned, there are now more receivers, than givers. The givers will be required to feed the receivers greater amounts in the future with less and less givers. Requir­ing fewer givers to give greater amounts to sat­isfy the hunger, soon the out­come will be???????

  2. What it is right now den.

    The money will con­tinue to go into the hands of the rich bankers, CEO’s, etc.

    Just like it always has.

Post a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.