counter Environment : MGx – Musings, Essays & Ballads

Environment

Plundertown USA, a history of resource extraction in Coos Bay

Sadly, the details outlined in Al Sandine’s 2003 book Plundertown, USA: Coos Bay Enters the Global Economy wherein Weyerhauser and GP logged old growth at a rate that exceeded regrowth rates and then abandoned the area to repeat the process in Indonesia and Brazil, is about to be replayed. This time the resource is chromite and other metals to be taken via strip mining from Coos County forest lands for a paltry royalty of 3%. ORC the foreign owned corporation tasked with extracting the ore and a mineral lease from the County is now discouraging the County from doing any due diligence such as test drilling and has even refused to reveal the results of their own test drills. In other words, ORC wants Coos County to sign a mineral lease without knowing what is in the ground.

Guess what? Commissioners Nikki Whitty and Kevin Stufflebean are keen to take the word of ORC and just sign a deal possibly giving up millions or even billions of dollars of public resources for the promise of 70 jobs (minus the 22 from the road crew, so really less than 50 jobs). Only Bob Main is keen on doing the necessary research to protect public assets. Dan Smith, discouraged the commissioners from doing their own test drilling at a cost of $70k as unnecessary and then refused to share their own core samples without a signed lease first. ORC’s survival as an entity is dependent on outside funding which is contingent upon Smith extracting an inexpensive mineral lease from Coos County.

Write, call and raise your voice at the next BOC meeting in April
Next BOC meeting – April 6th – 9:30 a.m. – Coos County Commissioner Courtroom, Coos County Courthouse.

Bob Main:
(541) 396-3121 or (541) 756-2020 ext 770
bmain@co.coos.or.us

Nikki Whitty:
(541) 396-3121 or (541) 756-2020 ext 247
nwhitty@co.coos.or.us

Kevin Stufflebean:
(541) 396-3121 or (541) 756-2020 ext 281
kstufflebean@co.coos.or.us

City of Coos Bay considering a ban on wind energy within city limits?!?!

Apparently, without any public discussion, the City of Coos Bay plans to vote on a resolution banning the use of wind power conversion systems within city limits tonight.

The analysis and resolution are hereCoos Bay Wind Resolution. The analysis is not what you would call very analytical and is comprised primarily of general guidelines from ODOE’s website. Other communities were contacted to ask how they handle wind energy to mixed effect leading the author of the analysis to suggest taking a wait and see approach to urban turbines.

The last point is so very typical of Coos County as a whole. Why be an innovator or take the lead in anything when it is so much easier to be a follower and wait and see what other cities do? Nowhere in the analysis is there mention of having spoken to anyone in the industry for qualified answers to the questions raised about citing wind in commercial, industrial or residential areas.

So while the city has taken a neutral position on siting an LNG terminal and building a 36″ gas pipeline why, all of a sudden do they have a fire burning to ban wind? Any ideas, anyone?

Recently, I read the SCDC submission to the AIA Sustainable Design Assessment Team (SDAT) committee which seeks to

provide a road map for communities seeking to improve their sustainability—as defined by a community’s ability to meet the needs of today without reducing the ability of future generations to meet their needs [emphasis mine]

The submission gives a pretty clear picture of who SCDC blames for the County’s economic woes these last thirty years.

From its founding, Coos County grew and prospered through its natural resources and the timber, agriculture, milling, shipping and commercial fishing industries. But the 1970’s saw the beginnings of these industries’ ebb. The environmental movement, the spotted owl controversy, government regulations and technological advances in production [emphasis mine] saw a gradual but unstoppable decline in timber harvest, lumber mills, shipping and commercial fishing. The area slumped into major economic hard times. Today, Oregon is second in the nation in unemployment, due in large part to this region, with an unemployment rate of 15%.

The ‘technological advances in production’ must mean ‘cheaper labor in China’. As to the environmentalists and the regulators, unfortunately they weren’t here to stop Weyerhauser from choosing profits over stewardship of the local resources. Nor were they here to stop Weyerhauser from leaving when it became more profitable to move on.

For a reference I read two of the other submissions, Bridgport, CT and Allentown, PA and it was noticeable the authors didn’t seek to place blame or, more accurately, pass the buck. Truly, it is a feather in the cap of SCDC to have submitted an application and I am pleased they did so and more pleased the area was chosen. Kudos!

There are some seeming omissions from the application, however, that make these closing statements in the introduction letter below not quite accurate.

Our clearly-defined objective, identified as the key issue in each of the three aforementioned meetings, is that our citizens will be able to look forward to — and believe in – a sustainable future, through a vision created together.

Namely, while the Port and its future railroad, Jordan Cove and its LNG and ORC and its strip mining, The Mill Casino and its gambling are listed as bright possibilities for the future of Coos Bay there is no mention of any real sustainable industries. (The opposition to the LNG is given passing mention and attributed to retirees that don’t like change). There appears to be no input from any environmentalists or proponents of sustainable industry in the application at all.

Also receiving glowing mention are SCDC members Bandon Dunes and The World with nary a word about The Sentinel or The Bandon Western World (unless you count it as The World).

In Joseph Tainter’s, ‘The Collapse of Complex Societies’, it is pointed out again and again from the collapse of the Romans, the Mayans to the Chacoans that resource depletion is not the cause of collapse in complex systems. Rather it is the leaders of these societies inability to adapt to resource depletion and changing conditions that brings about economic and societal failure.

Coos County is a glowing empirical example of the truth of Tainter’s conclusions. Nothing could punctuate the reason for 15% unemployment and empty storefronts more than the City of Coos Bay’s inability to adapt to a changing environmental and economic landscape than this proposed resolution to ban wind energy until another city models for them what to do!

Coos County has no leadership. The county and its cities are governed by followship and the economic depression that has prevailed these last 30 years will continue unless as Thomas Homer-Dixon hypothesizes in ‘The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity and the Renewal of Civilization” the local electorate are finally catalyzed to do something about it and stop repeating the same tired old schemes and try something new

Strip mining coming to Coos County? UPDATED

The gang at SCDC (South Coast Development Council) are hot to aid and abet Oregon Resources Corp to begin strip mining for chromite and other minerals (supposedly no gold or platinum, they will put that back???).

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has issued the definitive operating permit, giving the Portland-based firm approval to mine chromite, zircon, high-iron and garnet off Seven Devils Road between Charleston and Bandon.

‘Everything fell into place,” said Dan Smith, Oregon Resources’ chief operating officer.

Watching the video of a January 28, 2010 SCDC meeting shows Sandy Messerle (I think) absolutely gushing about 70 new jobs in the county as Smith downplays the potential environmental issues, explains how badly they have been treated by the various permitting agencies and mocks Oregon for having an international reputation for being tough to strip mine in. He also emphasized that funding for ORC was being held up pending permits and the future of the foreign owned corporation was in dependent upon expediting the go ahead. One thing is certain, not a single person present at the meeting even questions the possible long term effects if even the slightest thing goes wrong with ORC’s operation.

Remember the 12″ gas pipeline and that debacle. The same movers and shakers presiding over that mess are supporting this venture despite a large local fishing community and the potential to damage already diminished salmon runs and wetlands. [Photo courtesy of Larry Van Elsberg]

Jobs are critical but of the 70+ positions how many will be filled with local workers, how many are really family wage and what happens in 18 years when ORC is done pulling public resources out of the ground? No one at the meeting considered the 22 road workers laid off to afford the $450K cost of upgrading a perfectly serviceable county road to ‘industrial grade’.

Also, during the January 28 SCDC meeting, Port Director, Jeffrey Bishop discusses the odd land lease arrangement with Weyerhauser. Did I hear right? Was the lease arrangement based on a future property value IF the LNG terminal was built? If someone has time to watch, please let me know what that is about.

**Received a note from a reader that correctly noted the Port had a purchase agreement (actually paid $25M?) and now they are in a pure option agreement (Weyerhauser gave back the money.. with interest???) So, did the port make a purchase of land based upon an appraised future value? Would a legitimate appraiser do such a thing and would it be legal for the port to make such an arrangement without an appraisal? **

The funny thing about SCDC is I am sure if they believed there was a billion barrels of oil under the ground they would fall all over themselves trying to drill for it. There is the equivalent of a billion barrels of oil under the ground in wind resource in this county and money to be made and saved in renewable energy but these guys only want to entertain another Weyerhauser business model. They want to be dependent on some outside plunderer who will take the public resources and then pack up and leave taking their jobs with them. It is not like it hasn’t happened here before.

Americans fear debt to China more than terrorism

A new Zogby poll indicates Americans are wisely beginning to question the manner in which we have financed the war against terrorism. Meanwhile China engages in female infanticide.

More than twice as many U.S. adults (58%) say that debt owed to China is a more serious threat to the long-term security and well-being of the U.S than is terrorism from radical Islamic terrorists (27%).

Interestingly there was little variation by party identification with a majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents all agreeing that the debt owed by the United States to China poses the greater threat.

Meanwhile, in a painful snapshot of the social values of Americas largest creditor ‘gendercide’, discarding infant girls at birth, is still practiced in China to bad effect.

XINRAN XUE, a Chinese writer, describes visiting a peasant family in the Yimeng area of Shandong province. The wife was giving birth. “We had scarcely sat down in the kitchen”, she writes (see article), “when we heard a moan of pain from the bedroom next door…The cries from the inner room grew louder—and abruptly stopped. There was a low sob, and then a man’s gruff voice said accusingly: ‘Useless thing!’

“Suddenly, I thought I heard a slight movement in the slops pail behind me,” Miss Xinran remembers. “To my absolute horror, I saw a tiny foot poking out of the pail. The midwife must have dropped that tiny baby alive into the slops pail! I nearly threw myself at it, but the two policemen [who had accompanied me] held my shoulders in a firm grip. ‘Don’t move, you can’t save it, it’s too late.’

The result of the male female imbalance is that unpartnered young adult males turn to crime and violence.

Throughout human history, young men have been responsible for the vast preponderance of crime and violence—especially single men in countries where status and social acceptance depend on being married and having children, as it does in China and India. A rising population of frustrated single men spells trouble.

The crime rate has almost doubled in China during the past 20 years of rising sex ratios, with stories abounding of bride abduction, the trafficking of women, rape and prostitution. A study into whether these things were connected† concluded that they were, and that higher sex ratios accounted for about one-seventh of the rise in crime. In India, too, there is a correlation between provincial crime rates and sex ratios. In “Bare Branches”††, Valerie Hudson and Andrea den Boer gave warning that the social problems of biased sex ratios would lead to more authoritarian policing. Governments, they say, “must decrease the threat to society posed by these young men. Increased authoritarianism in an effort to crack down on crime, gangs, smuggling and so forth can be one result.”

Gender discrepancy is happening all over the world with a corresponding rise in violence… boys need girls and we girls need boys in equal numbers or all hell breaks out.

Also, while on the subject of China, South Africa is now accepting major investments in energy and rare earth mining and refining from China. Like America, they hope to develop jobs and improve the South African economy. Relying heavily on China hasn’t worked out so well here.

Decentralized energy is the logical solution to climate change and water shortage

Living in the hydro-rich Pacific Northwest it is hard to imagine rationing showers and lawn watering in order to have a few hours a day of electricity, but that is what is happening in Venezuela right now.

One of the severest droughts in decades has given Venezuela’s socialist president a political nightmare as hydro-electrical power dribbles to a standstill, unleashing blackouts, rationing and protests. The waters behind the Guri dam, which supplies more than half the nation’s power, have touched perilously low levels.

Nevertheless, with energy production requiring as much water as agriculture and once mighty rivers like the Rio Grande no longer reaching the ocean and energy usage expected to grow beyond existing capacity, unless we decentralize now, it will happen here.

There are many reasons I focus upon wind energy, not the least being the ample supply…this from the November 2009 Scientific American.

Plenty of Supply
Today the maximum power consumed worldwide at any given moment is about 12.5 trillion watts (terawatts, or TW), according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The agency projects that in 2030 the world will require 16.9 TW of power as global population and living standards rise, with about 2.8 TW in the
U.S. The mix of sources is similar to today’s, heavily dependent on fossil fuels. If, however, the planet were powered entirely by WWS, with no fossil-fuel or biomass combustion, an intriguing savings would occur. Global power demand would be only 11.5 TW, and U.S. demand would be 1.8 TW. That decline occurs because, in most cases, electrification is a more efficient way to use energy. For example, only 17 to 20 percent of the energy in gasoline is used to move a vehicle (the rest is wasted as heat), whereas 75 to 86 percent of the electricity delivered to an electric vehicle goes into motion.

Even if demand did rise to 16.9 TW, WWS sources could provide far more power. Detailed studies by us and others indicate that energy from the wind, worldwide, is about 1,700 TW

Another reason I favor wind is that wind is the only renewable energy source that does not require any water during the production of electricity. Even solar requires massive amounts of water when used in a centralized system.

According to the American Wind Energy Association, to generate one kilowatt hour of electricity from nuclear power 2.3 litres of water are needed. Coal requires 1.9 litres and oil consumes 1.6 litres…Some CSP technology utilises rows of curved mirrors focus heat onto a tube filled with oil which boils water to make steam, in turn spinning a turbine a turbine – this is called a trough system. Another uses reflective mirrors called heliostats to reflect and concentrate sunlight onto liquid-filled tubes used to generate steam and spin turbines.

In the case of trough technology, the water footprint is considerable – around 3.6 litres per kilowatt hour.

This video produced in England shares the benefits of decentralizing even if still using fossil fuels.

V-LIM launch date coming soon!

All this time I thought research and development and prototype design was the hardest part (and believe me it isn’t easy), but the procedural side of launching a new product is pretty damned intense. The brain power required from conceptualization to production is not only extensive but the diversity required puts the old ‘thinking ten moves ahead’ process in a chess game to shame.

There are so many facets to consider and I am so grateful to have backers, partners, friends, lawyers, accountants and employees capable of contributing so much to this effort. This is both an exhilarating time and a critically demanding time but I love what I am doing and look forward to each 16 hour day.

These stills will be animated into some educational videos describing how the LIM works and placed on the Rogue River Wind website that is also being professionally designed.

The above is fun but there is also the nuts and bolts paperwork side, shareholder agreements, manufacturing contracts, procedural manuals and regulatory issues. Tracking regulatory changes and legislative issues like investor owned utility PG&E trying to make competition illegal.

The state wants to encourage power-company competition, green energy and lower rates with the Community Choice law.

So, how does Pacific Gas & Electric Co. respond to these threats to its monopoly?

The utility giant bankrolls a deceptive June ballot initiative that seeks to rewrite California’s constitution, kill upstarts in their tracks and block the expansion of municipal utility companies such as the one saving money for residents of Sacramento.

Considering that Congress hasn’t been able to accomplish much requiring a 60 vote filibuster proof majority rather than the old 51 votes, PG&E’s request to require two-thirds of voters to approve an alternative energy option, dooms renewable energy in California to painful and costly death. Grrrr!

Okay, back to business and the website will carry all our technical information soon and will provide an energy blog with updates just like the one above.

Rare earth shortages may put China in the drivers seat on green energy

As I have been writing for some time, China controls the rare earth magnet market. With the push for more wind farms and electric vehicles and China’s own growth in these industries, China may stop exporting except within a completed manufactured product.

“Countries and companies that have or plan to develop industries that need rare earth minerals to make products are concerned about China’s growing consumption, which they fear will eliminate China’s exports of rare earths,” said W. David Menzie, chief of the international minerals section at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).

China has also encouraged companies that use rare earths to locate their manufacturing facilities in China, Menzie told TechNewsDaily. But some companies fear moving because of concerns about intellectual property protection, he added.

China is fast becoming known, rightly or wrongly, as the king of IP ripoffs and few companies want to take the chance of partnering with them, especially on their own turf. Then, of course, for socially conscientious companies that want to create manufacturing jobs in the US, moving to China is not an option.

There is some pressure on Congress to provide incentives to support the mining of existing rare earth deposits in the US but the technology to process it still lies with the Chinese. Some are speculating the next resource wars will not be held over oil but rare earth metals.

Rare earth neodymium magnets are critical to the wind industry, including the V-LIM, and while there are plans to reopen Mountain Pass in California for rare earth mining, there is no ready solution in sight despite neodymium being a critical part of all weapons guidance systems and homeland security.

As one of the worst polluters on the planet, knowing the future of green energy, homeland security and the weapons and guidance systems on everytank, fighter jet and aircraft carrier relies on foreign relations with China is a bit scary.

Peru ousts US mining firm for failing to meet environmental clean up requirements

Doe Run was evicted from Peru

Peru’s mining, oil and energy association (SNMPE) said Saturday it has expelled US mining company Doe Run from its roster for not cleaning up its pollution problems, which environmentalists say are among the worst in the world.

“It has not shown… any willingness to comply with its environmental commitments and its obligations to the country, its workers, the La Oroya population and its creditors,” SNMPE said in a statement.

So we have high hopes that ORC will not behave like Doe Run? Are both companies possibly tied through the myriad offshore corporations controlling the purse strings of both companies? Would be interesting to find out.

Green Professionals Conference Tuesday January 26 in Portland

Keynote speaker, Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission heads off an all star list of movers and shakers in the sustainable futures field, in Portland. Also on the docket, gubernatorial candidate and member of the Global Warming Advisory Committee, Bill Bradbury.

The event will be held at the Double Tree Hotel, 1000 NE Multnomah St, Portland, Oregon

New Years catch up #2 the V-LIM wind turbine

Rogue River Wind is very proud to announce the successful development of a high bandwidth wind powered generator capable of working in turbulent, gusty wind at all speeds utilizing the increased aerodynamic efficiencies of ducted fan technology. To be specific what we mean by high bandwidth is that unlike typical power curves where the turbine only produces power between 22 and 29mph for example, the LIM turns on at 8mph but more importantly continues to produce power at 80 or 90mph. Since the power output of a turbine is proportional to the cube of the velocity, every time you double the wind speed you get 8 times the power.

We did it. We will be build one more pre production prototype before beginning the full production V-LIM here in Oregon but what is most exciting is the scalability of the generator.

With a few adjustments generators now being purchased with American tax dollars from China could be built right here in the US with much higher efficiencies and providing American jobs. Something to think about with respect to the new $1.4B Oregon Shepherd’s Flat wind farm slated for 2012. While the LIM generator coupled to the standard open bladed wind turbines will not operate at a high bandwidth because open bladed fans simply cannot, the generator can be stacked and perform much better than the Chinese generators based upon 1930’s technology…. AND MADE IN AMERICA!

We will be making some noise about these jobs going offshore when we can build them right here, providing long term family wage jobs in Oregon, in the coming days and weeks. Please watch the news and contact your representatives to keep American tax dollars in the US.

It has been painful, it has been hard, but boy am I a happy camper!

Maddow – Thomas Friedman on Copenhagen

Thomas Friedman, author of Hot, Flat and Crowded breaks down what happened or didn’t happen in Copenhagen regarding climate change and sums it that change has to happen at the grassroots level.

V-LIM Power curves

The first power curves for the V-LIM are done and I will publish them here after some additional verification soon. We have learned a lot from these tests, have changed the magnet topology for a more focused flux and will segment the stator for faster saturation in the production models. Even without these changes we outperform our competitors and after such a long hard struggle, I can’t tell if I am happy or just relieved to be past this point. Am definitely exhausted.

More data soon to come, here and at Rogue River Wind.

Oil sands and water, the big environmental crisis

Picture 10Nifty little animation detailing the high price of oil sands, not the least of which is 4 barrels of water required for every barrel of oil produced. To learn more about our dwindling supply of water watch Blue Gold: World Water Wars

H2oil animated sequences from Dale Hayward on Vimeo.

V-LIM generator testing, prepping everything

IMG_0788Takes a lot of time to set up the load in order to test this generator. We are winding inductors, ordering resistors, locking the axle down tight to avoid torquing the whole thing across the building and borrowing meters, oscilloscopes and all matter of digital displays…