All Posts Tagged With: "Coquille City Council"
Coquille raw sewage dumps into the river
Five thousand gallons of raw sewage were ‘accidentally’ dumped into the Coquille River when a computer malfunction or power failure caused a pump to stop working. Forgive my skepticism but when I ride my bike by and have to hold my breath and see bubbling brown ooze cresting the top of the plant, I can’t help but wonder if the release was more intentional than accidental.
The sewer treatment issue has long been debated around here with the City Council continually voting to defer badly needed maintenance. Unfortunately, the aging council members don’t even have the good grace to stop running for a seat in favor of some new blood. The antique council might explain why they continue with the same city manager despite a mediocre performance these last nine or ten years.
Please Coquille, can these people!
PS. Filter your drinking water
Coquille City Council meeting tonight
Typically, the council meetings have been poorly attended with the exception of the occasional hot topic that draws people away from home and family to listen in on city business. My hope is that the recent revelations at the county, i.e. what they do when people aren’t watching might encourage more people to attend city, school and port commission meetings. Truthfully we can’t blame officials for acting without input if the public shows little interest in what they do.
Having said all that I will be staying away from the Coquille meetings until some new, (one in particular),semi regular attendees stop going or learn some manners. It is so discouraging to see everyone else allow bad manners and never raise a finger to scold or defend the victim of those bad manners. Public meetings should be run with decorum and dignity and civic leaders should model it and insist upon it.
Coos County and City of Coquille ignore resource of experience
A speaker at last week’s Board of Commissioners meeting talked about how experienced employees are an invaluable resource. The speaker, Don Beebe, expressed what a travesty it was not to tap that wealth of experience during the recent reorganization at the Road Department.
From the outside looking in, unfortunately the only perspective available to the public given the opacity of the Board’s decision, the disregard for experienced input reflects an arrogant disdain for the citizens as well as the employees and has the sharp acrid scent of hubris. How dare the Board behave as if the citizens have nothing of value to contribute on such an important topic as public safety?
Evidently the Coquille City Council has no more regard for the collective experience of the voters than the Board. Certainly we can hope that their choice of Matt Muenchrath to the Council will benefit all the citizens despite their own mediocre performance.
Still it was their choice, just six people not the electorate. These same six people have presided while a wildly unpopular and apparently incompetent police chief was allowed to run roughshod throughout the City and his department without any management or oversight from the city manager for years.
These same six people continue to allow the city manager to behave as if he were not responsible for the many police department failings. They have provided no guidance to the city manager while an unsolved murder, a critically injured member of the public, thousands of dollars stolen and the misuse of City computers happened right under his nose.
Once again I detect the scent of hubris. Arbitrary council rules enacted years ago were used to wrest control from and justify ignoring the experience of the public.
Assuming the Board of Commissioners ignores public testimony and outcry and goes through with the Road Department layoffs the already high unemployment rate in Coquille will jump even higher. The layoff will effect schools, businesses and further reduce our tax base. Will the ever vigilant and alert Coquille City Council develop a plan to deal with these inevitable changes or come up with knee jerk reactions just like the Board?
Resource depletion is not why budgets get tight or societies fail. They fail because leaders do not adapt to resource depletion. The Board has not responded or adapted to changing economic conditions, instead they have reacted, frantically, wildly in a state of panic. Reaction is not leadership it is the absence of leadership.
Instead of blaming the legislature or pleading with a large corporation to ride in like a white knight and rescue the county like a damsel in distress there are many solutions available to enable local sustainability that are much more dignified. These solutions will require adaptation and a willingness to think out of the box but they do exist.
Energy is one way to become self-sustaining and fund public services such as road maintenance, public health and education. Five megawatts of distributed generating power operating at full capacity can earn $3M annual revenue. Using a ratio of 1.4 and assuming a AAA credit rating, $3M qualifies for $2.1M in debt service and translates into $19.2M financing at 9.5% interest although a bank will limit a loan to 80% of cost.
Centralized wind farms cost about $1.5M per megawatt excluding the cost of transmission. At that cost $19M in financing would pay for more than 12MW of power generation and might provide some insight into why energy is popular on Wall Street. The net earnings $.9M after paying debt service assumes a 20-year loan but distributed generation is less expensive than centralized power allowing a much faster payoff.
Generating 5 or 10MW of power locally instead of importing power and exporting dollars to investor owned utilities is just one of many ways to adapt the resources we have to suit our changing needs. These are by no means simple deals to structure but they are done successfully in the US and Europe, all it takes is competent and adaptive leadership.
If we invite the collective experience of our citizens and the people we work with everyday rather than keeping everyone in the dark many unique solutions will have the opportunity to present themselves. Hubris is not adaptive and the very act of excluding the very people affected by a decision from the decision process is polarizing and invites mistrust. For this reason, I believe Stufflebean has impaired his own ability to lead and should resign as interim roadmaster and give up his liaison assignment to the Road Department.
Status quo in Coquille
One can hope that the citizens of Coquille will be well served with Matt Muenchrath on the council. Odds are good that he will probably read and study up on the matters brought before the council whereas it is often questionable whether the other councilors do. He may even pay attention during council meetings and not nod off. He may even ask relevant questions and may not vote in lock step with everyone else as is usually the case.
Or, he may be more of the same only more attentive. Who knows whether he will work with or against the mayor or nod in affirmation for the bland and lack luster performance and meager managerial skills of the standing city manager. Take note that four of the votes Muenchrath received allowed a city manager to retain an incompetent police chief for years to the detriment of the city and had thousands of dollars stolen right from under his nose.
Apparently, the city manager will escape rebuke for his glowing failures because the council is asleep on the job as usual or so mired in misdirected loyalty to the police department simply because they are the police department and not because they earned it. Thank goodness the new chief came along before another member of the public was injured or more money absconded with and to reveal the incompetence of the former chief and his negligent retention by the city manager.
Hopefully, Muenchrath is not just more of the same, determined to maintain the status quo for the few it serves because if he is, nothing will improve until a real city manager comes along, because we can’t expect any direction from the council.
Coquille City Council choose Muenchrath
Coquille City Council voted 4 to 2 to vote in Matt Muenchrath, who never lifted a finger for the position or had the good character to respond to my request for a legal opinion regarding the handling of the Hagen debacle, for city councilor. So much for their word which is worthless and so much for Muenchrath whom I would like if he had not taken the cheesy way out to get on the council. What a huge bunch of pussies.
This is just another affirmation along with having my pocket picked by the City of Coquille why I will never do business with Coquille. They deserve their poverty, the high unemployment and the high vacancy rate. City Hall has earned all these negative accolades in spades.
Amazing that an errant city councilor too irresponsible to bring a timely resignation to the council can hold the city hostage and the city council allow it. In the end 710 votes to 4 decided the choice of city councilor and it was not the citizens who were served. Shame on Muenchrath for not have the balls to run for the position and interjecting himself into this mess.
Happily, voters remember.
Today I asked Matt Muenchrath to render an opinion on Coquille council decision
This morning I dropped off a copy of Eldon Rollins’ letter to Coquille City Council members to see if he would render an opinion on the council handling of electoral results. He is out of the office this week but will be in next week and I hope he will give the matter some thought. While I do not know, Muenchrath I can’t imagine he would support violating the charter or city elections codes if that is what has happened, in order to attain a council seat.
Hopefully he will have time to review the charter, rule book and elections manual before the January 5 meeting. Meanwhile, we have other people around the state looking at this also and despite the holidays expect answers before New Years.
Concerned Citizens of Coquille speaks about process
Dian has put up a good post about the local democratic process as it is enacted here in Coquille and does a handy job of fingering the usually flawed logic delivered by the Coquille equivalent to the National Enquirer.
There is no need for me to elaborate on Dian’s thoughts here but I will say my view of the job of the council is to steward public money and assets and respect the will of the people. The council can listen to the opinion of hired staff but is supposed to instruct the city manager not be instructed.
The council is just too old and too complacent and too lethargic to really dig into the city’s problems. They are given a packet of information chosen by the city manager a couple of days before the council meeting and there is very little evidence they ever do any fact checking or analysis or serious exploration of alternatives of their own. They accept at blind faith that staff has done all that for them. Certainly as regards the handling of the police department and the water/sewer issue it is really hard to understand how staff has earned so much faith.
Now at the urging of staff, the council has put itself into a very uncomfortable position regarding the council seat. Thanks to ’staff’ they will be damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Apparently, ’staff’ hires the city attorney and continues to employ John Trew who has exhibited poor judgment in the past. Did he consider the liability to the city when ‘harpy’ was slandering and defaming a citizen during a council meeting? Apparently, a letter sent by the citizen’s (me) attorney alerting the council to the falsity of the statements and the precarious nature it put the city in was never forwarded from Trew to the council as it would have been in any other city.
Why does the council have such a low bar of expectations for the city manager? In the last two years I have attended many city council meetings around the state and country and I wish some of our council would do the same just to see the contrast and professionalism that can be attained. Surely, Coquille can do much better and replace those old fossils on the council.
Eldon points out in his letter the councils decision to throw out the election results for only three of the candidates.
Further, there appears to be nothing in the City Charter, let alone the City Council Procedural Rules, that grants authority to the City Council to ignore or unilaterally invalidate the election results entirely, just because one candidate was determined to have been ineligible at the time of the election. In other words, there is no provision at all which renders any of the other candidates ineligible for election to the City council merely because Kathy Hagen was ineligible for election.
If there had been a provision allowing the City Council to disregard the election results as they apply to some of the candidates, then they would probably apply to all the candidates, including the 2 currently presumed to have won re-election, being Corky Daniels and Fran Capehart, but no one appears to be challenging their re-elections.
[emphasis mine]
We now have five new people that want three seats. What a great opportunity for change that would be!!!
Coquille Valley Sentinel to publish letter questioning council applications process
A letter sent to each of the city councilors and the mayor reproduced below will be published in the upcoming Coquille valley Sentinel questioning the reasoning and legality of invalidating election results because of the ineligibility of one candidate.
To the Coquille City Council:
During the Special Council Session in the first part of this month, the Council was advised by the City Manager that the Council had the legal authority and responsibility to select a replacement for Kathy Hagen’s seat on the City Council. He advised that this controlling authority originated in City Charter sections 32 and 33, and flowed through the City Council Procedural Rules, section 17, a and b., which stipulates that applicants to fill a vacancy will be interviewed by the Council and the Council will decide who to select for the position.
These City Charter sections and Procedural Rules were deemed to be the controlling authority on the presumption that Kathy Hagen actually won re-election to her City Council seat and therefore had something to resign from for the 4 year period starting January 2009; however, Section 12 of the City Charter states that no person shall be eligible for a city elective office unless at the time of the election he or she meets the State Constitution requirements and has also resided within the City Limits for the 12 months immediately preceding the election.
Since Kathy Hagen moved out of the City after filing for re-election, but before the election took place, even though her name appeared on the ballot, she did not meet the residency requirement, and therefore did not qualify to stand for election at the time of the election, and therefore cannot be considered to have re-won her seat on the City Council. Since she did not officially win re-election, her subsequent resignation can only be considered to apply to the remainder of this term of office, and not to the 4 year term commencing in January 2009.
Further, there appears to be nothing in the City Charter, let alone the City Council Procedural Rules, that grants authority to the City Council to ignore or unilaterally invalidate the election results entirely, just because one candidate was determined to have been ineligible at the time of the election. In other words, there is no provision at all which renders any of the other candidates ineligible for election to the City council merely because Kathy Hagen was ineligible for election.
If there had been a provision allowing the City Council to disregard the election results as they apply to some of the candidates, then they would probably apply to all the candidates, including the 2 currently presumed to have won re-election, being Corky Daniels and Fran Capehart, but no one appears to be challenging their re-elections.
Barring any contrary legal authority in the State Constitution, I believe the election results should be obtained in one of two ways:
draw a line through Kathy Hagen’s name and vote tally and select the top vote getter from the remaining 3 candidates, or have a run-off election.
The letter is written by Eldon Rollins and was delivered to City Hall on earlier today. Additionally, I have forwarded the pertinent sections of the city elections manual, city charter and rule book to Rural Organizing Project which specializes in just such sticky democracy process problems. In turn, ROP is having the charter reviewed by lawyers who specialize in election law to get their interpretation of this unusual circumstance. Perhaps, some local lawyers may wish to render an opinion on the matter as well.
Coquille city management is in stark contrast to other cities.
While no reason is given, Gold Beach has suspended their police chief, Russ Merkley, placing him on temporary, indefinite paid leave. Gold Beach administrator, Don Flynn will supervise the police department until a replacement can be found. Having watched the Coquille City Council these last two years I marvel when I read stories like this or the one where a discontented Reedsport withheld a raise from their city manager.
It seems that some city councils really do pay attention and ‘council’ their hired administrators. Yet here in Coquille a city manager of eight years that has repeatedly demonstrated a lack of departmental oversight, receives little or no admonition or ‘oversight’ from the council.
As I read the latest news regarding disgraced officer, Randy Ulmer, I can’t help but get angrier and angrier at city manager, Terence O’Connor for ignoring complaints about then police chief, Mike Reaves. Again and again he sided with the chief over the safety and well being of the citizens. His indifference to actions and inaction of his friend and ex chief, has, in my opinion contributed to the downfall of Randy Ulmer.
Personally, I had my own issues with Ulmer and regarded him as either, incompetent and just plain slow witted or thoroughly dishonest, either way the net result for me was negative. That said, I don’t really think he is a horrible person and he has a very nice family that are no doubt all suffering greatly at this time. So I can’t help but get angry because there is no question that a real police chief would have already implemented the structure and policies to have prevented this from ever occuring. Further, had Ulmer had any real supervision, his gambling (if that is in fact what the problem was) might have been discovered and counseling sought to help him with it long before it got to this point.
So we have had some tort claims, some insurance payouts from grievances, a man who never had an opportunity to give his side of the story is now a quadriplegic, numerous other complaints and potential for lawsuits under the watch of Terence O’Connor and our council does nothing. As I understand it, O’Connor, knowing full well that Reaves was leaving the job and the profession let the city pay for a week long jaunt at a police chiefs annual gala shortly before he retired.
It took hiring a real professional for the job of police chief to even uncover the depths the department had sunk under the former chief and with the full complicity of the current city manager.
Frankly, our police chief is over qualified to be answering to someone like O’Connor and I believe our council is remiss in not seeking a professional to replace him. Just look at the wonders that have been performed at the PD and just think how wonderful this city might be.
O’Connor is not alone in his responsibility as I think of Councilor Capehart and her blind allegiance to the police department simply because her husband was a trooper, her constituents be damned. The same can be said for Bruce Parker and I note they have both been mum on the topic of the total mess the new police chief inherited, much of it on their watch.
Now, it seems the city manager may have knowingly or unknowingly advised the council incorrectly regarding the Kathy Hagen debacle, possibly to the point that they are violating the city charter and disenfranchising voters. More on this soon as I have requested some outside legal opinion.
As mentioned I attended the county commission meeting yesterday regarding the annex building and downtown parking. O’Connor quipped that people will ‘walk two blocks to shop at Pony Village Mall’ but are too lazy to stretch their legs to shop downtown and suggested that people should think of the benefits to their figures.
Apparently, he feels the parking problem is the fault of the shoppers and not a concern for the city to try and solve. Clearly, in his mind, the merchants can solve their own parking problem by catering only to physically fit patrons.
It is a good sign that six, count ‘em six, people applied for the city council and a couple of them were young to boot! We must have some new blood on the council, willing to work with our mayor and not against him, to move this city out of the mud flats from which it has settled.
Coos County Commissioners to mull annex to parking request
I sat in on the Coos County Commission meeting today which was to expressly address the matter of converting the old annex next to the Old City Hall into parking. Terence O’Connor and John Higgins were representing the City and the topic veered off the annex and meeting the parking needs of downtown merchants onto meeting the needs of the court house and its employees and trial jurors.
While very little time was spent talking about the annex the overall consensus appeared to be that the county will sell it thereby placing it on the tax roll to generate revenue for the county. Steve Tucker of Tucker Appliances apparently wants to buy the property but is concerned about ruffling feathers at City Hall. O’Connor assured him that the City would do everything they could to entice a new business into Coquille, (everything except solve the parking problem).
The County seemed predisposed to looking into a parking permit relationship with the City on behalf of court house employees although O’Connor seemed to think the City Council would be uninterested in doing that. Probably a disappointing meeting from the standpoint of the downtown merchants.
Commissioner Whitty told O’Connor that he could report back to the council that the County was ‘working on it’.
Coquille council seat position in the news
The World and KCBY are reporting on the interview process last night to fill the seat ‘vacated’ by Kathy Hagen. However, the question has been raised since Hagen was not eligible on the day of election therefore she never won the seat and thus had no seat to ‘vacate’.
Mayor Britton, accepting the interpretations of city attorney, John Trew and city manager, Terence O’Connor, of council rules and the city charter is quoted as saying the council had no choice but to engage in this interview process.
“I would much prefer that the general election would select our next council person but our council rules say that in the event of a vacated position, this is the process we have to go through to select the council person.”
[Emphasis mine]
Nevertheless, it appears that the council might be violating the charter by having accepted an ineligible Hagen as elected to the council.
SECTION 12. QUALIFICATION OF OFFICERS. No person shall be eligible for an elective office of the city unless at the time of the election he/she is a qualified elector within the meaning of the state constitution and has resided in the city during 12 months immediately preceding the election.
Hagen did not reside in the city on election day, (unconfirmed reports state she may have been a part time resident for several months). So was the council remiss in treating Hagen’s ineligibility to serve on the council and resignation as a ‘vacated’ seat? Has the council misinterpreted the charter and state and local election laws to the detriment of the electorate?
Lawyer Matt Muenchrath apparently too busy to run for the election has seized on this opportunity to ease his way onto the city council. Frankly, I was impressed with Muenchrath and certainly hope he will make the effort to run in the next election two years from now but I feel strongly that he should earn his position by working as hard to get elected as Dian has done, including attending city council meetings for the last two years. Where have you been Mr Muenchrath?
There is a comment from The World which bears quoting
What a Shame wrote on Dec 16, 2008 1:47 PM:
My vote would go to John Spencer or for Dian Courtright. There is enough business type on the counsel now. We need someone in there that represents the working person for a change and get away from “that is the way we have always done it” thinking. As a former counsel member myself, sometimes you have to make tough decisions and I think that these two people are the ones to do that for the citizens of Coquille. I think a lot of the voting decisions that some of the city counselers vote on today are made because the counseler tends to have his vote decision go towards how that vote would affect only a small handful of citizens when the vote should go towards how it would affect the entire city or it entire population.
Dian Courtright certainly represents the local working class admirably and her high vote count reflects the public’s confidence in her abilities. More importantly Dian if some interpretations of the charter are correct, won the seat fair and square. If this is true both she and the voters are being disenfranchised.
Meanwhile there is considerable pressure being placed upon the council by City Hall to ignore the votes in this process, in other words, the citizens don’t matter and this is now a personality contest with only five judges.
Coquille City Council interviews five candidates to fill vacancy
We watched the interviews last night, approximately eleven questions were asked of each candidate depending upon whether they had run for the council seat or not in the general election. One observation is that some of the candidates seemed more qualified to be councilors than those sitting, at least as regards to being alert, paying attention to what is going on in the city and working and playing well with others.
Amanda Davidson related her ten years in the Navy as part of her qualifications and appeared fairly comfortable in front of the council. John Spencer managed to weave in his entire life history, spending summers in Coquille as a boy, his August birthday, where his grandparents lived, how he rescued the Rotary clock and….
Local attorney, Matt Muenchrath, said he had not run during the election because he was not sure the time was right but decided to take a stab at the appointed position. He also took the opportunity to give a good thumbs up to the new police chief and seemed to be aware that the City had suffered under the past leadership. He further thought that many of the local ordinances might be updated or rewritten.
Dian kept her answers short feeling she had addressed most of the questions in her application. She was the only candidate that discussed her hope of helping the City become self sustaining and keeping dollars local and encouraging people to spend here.
I missed the final applicant to take my daughter home.
Eldon Rollins brought up a point to be considered regarding the city charter. According to Eldon, the Secretary of State says that local city charters supersede state law if, and only if, the charter addresses a matter. In this regard the charter does address the matter of eligible candidates and this gets back to how the council or counsel chooses to interpret the language.
SECTION 12. QUALIFICATION OF OFFICERS. No person shall be eligible for an elective office of the city unless at the time of the election he/she is a qualified elector within the meaning of the state constitution and has resided in the city during 12 months immediately preceding the election.
Vacating councilor Kathy Hagen was not qualified at the time of the election (unconfirmed reports state she was aware as far back as August she may not be able to take the seat). It would seem that the council could interpret Section 12 to mean that those votes cast for Hagen were forfeit and the next highest eligible elector should be seated.
By accepting Hagen as elected despite her ineligbility and then vacating her seat the council is effectively disenfranchising the collective votes of both Hagen and Dian or 1,500 plus people. There is nothing anyone can do about the Hagen votes but the council could choose to handle this matter much differently and listen to the 700+ votes that went to Dian.
The council is now supposed to vote immediately after the pledge of allegiance at the regular January city council meeting.
Coquille City Council to hold special meeting tonight and fill vacancy
Applications for the position of city council will be accepted until 5 PM and at 7 PM the public may attend as the council decides on a replacement for Kathy Hagen. Please show your support for Dian Courtright who campaigned so hard for the position and be at City Hall this evening.
Coquille pay heed, vacant Senate seat auctioned instead of peoples’ will
This is an extreme example of what can go wrong when a vacant public seat is filled, not by the will of the people, but left to the satisfaction of a few individuals.
Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich embarked on a “corruption crime spree” and tried to benefit from his ability to appoint President-elect Barack Obama’s replacement in the U.S. Senate, federal officials said Tuesday.
At a news conference in Chicago on Tuesday, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald called it a sad day for the citizens of Illinois and alleged that the governor tried to “auction off” the Senate seat “to the highest bidder.”
He said the alleged behavior “would make (Abe) Lincoln roll over in his grave.”
No one, especially this author, believes that the Coquille council seat is being auctioned or in any way mishandled. Rather, I point out this outrageous example to illustrate that subverting the will of the people, in other words not choosing the person with the highest number of votes, may seem very self serving and NOT in the best interests of the city.
Dian, as far as I can tell, was the only candidate who actively campaigned for the position going door to door and her high vote count reflects that hard work. Additionally, her concern for the city brought to the forefront many problems with the local PD and events subsequent to the formation of Concerned Citizens of Coquille have validated all our concerns, notably a member of the public was severely injured after an encounter with officers and another officers has admitted to felony theft.
On the bright side of Dian’s many accomplishments, video surveillance cameras are being installed in police vehicles and the city has hired a professional and highly qualified new police chief. Dian is well deserving of the Councils’ November 6, unanimous agreement to bring her on to the council.
Governor Blagojovich sought to punish the Chicago Tribune for unfavorable editorials calling for his impeachment, their opinions appear to have been well founded. Our own paper has suffered ridicule for daring to stand up for issues and hold the city accountable when that is one of the most important jobs of the media.