counter Warrantless snooping : MGx – Musings, Essays & Ballads

All Posts Tagged With: "Warrantless snooping"

Maddow — Whistleblower speaks about why he told of illegal wiretaps

picture-210Jus­tice Depart­ment lawyer Thomas Tamm speaks with Rachel about why he called the NY Times from a sub­way pay­phone that the Bush admin­is­tra­tion was engag­ing in war­rent­less wiretapping.

Colbert — The Word — Freaky three way calling

US energy needs by 2030">Wind to meet 20% US energy needs by 2030

Rec­og­niz­ing the impor­tance of address­ing the cli­mate change cri­sis and reduc­ing depen­dence upon for­eign oil and gas, the US Depart­ment of Energy (USDOE) has launched an aggres­sive pro­gram aim­ing to meet 20% of America’s energy needs via wind by 2030. In con­junc­tion with the National Renew­able Energy Lab­o­ra­tory (NREL) and the Amer­i­can Wind Energy Asso­ci­a­tion (AWEA), the USDOE pro­duced a study assess­ing the eco­nomic and envi­ron­men­tal costs and ben­e­fits of achiev­ing this goal.
The study can be read in its entirety at 20percentwind.org and con­cludes more than 500,000 jobs would be sup­ported with an increase of 100,000 jobs in sup­port­ing indus­tries and 200,000 more jobs through eco­nomic expan­sion at the local level. Other eco­nomic gains are expected annual prop­erty tax increases of $1.5B by 2030 and elec­tric price sta­bil­ity.
Deploy­ing wind energy and dis­plac­ing fos­sil fuel pow­ered plants will result in 825 mil­lion met­ric tons less car­bon diox­ide (CO2) emis­sions by 2030. Power gen­er­a­tion presently accounts for 40% of CO2 emis­sions in the US. Wind energy, unlike fos­sil fuel or nuclear gen­er­ated power does not require water so water con­sump­tion will drop also.
The study focuses entirely on cen­tral­ized wind energy or large wind farms despite grow­ing and suc­cess­ful imple­men­ta­tion of dis­trib­uted renew­able energy sys­tems in Europe. Nev­er­the­less, the study reveals that suc­cess­ful deploy­ment of an addi­tional 304GW of wind power to meet the 20% goal is depen­dent upon mas­sive invest­ment in the trans­mis­sion grid infra­struc­ture. Con­se­quently, 19,000 miles of new 765-kilovolt (kV) trans­mis­sion lines, for an esti­mated price tag of US $60 bil­lion are being pro­posed to Con­gress by high pow­ered energy play­ers like T Boone Pick­ens.
Other chal­lenges to the cen­tral­ized model include the need to develop larger elec­tric load bal­anc­ing areas, in tan­dem with bet­ter regional plan­ning to imple­ment gen­er­a­tion diver­sity. Accord­ing to the study, the US must increase annual wind power instal­la­tion by 16GW by 2018, within ten years. Obtain­ing per­mits from the Fed­eral Energy Reg­u­la­tory Com­mis­sion and other affected agen­cies in order to build out the trans­mis­sion infra­struc­ture to sup­port this growth can take up to ten years. This is one rea­son the Euro­pean Dis­trib­uted Energy Part­ner­ship (EUDEEP) formed to imple­ment wide scale dis­trib­uted energy pro­duc­tion to avoid many of these bar­ri­ers and costs.
Sig­nif­i­cantly, the study acknowl­edges that a “business-as-usual” approach will not meet these goals. A major national com­mit­ment to clean energy, CO2 reduc­tions and inde­pen­dence from for­eign resources is required at a grass roots level. From a grass roots level it will also be pos­si­ble to demon­strate that wide scale dis­trib­uted energy sys­tems can work in the US not just Europe and else­where. Hap­pily, there are sev­eral peo­ple work­ing on mak­ing the South Coast of Ore­gon a model of energy inde­pen­dence that the rest of the nation can build upon.
Please per­mit me a lit­tle diver­gence from topic here but I hope that in the inevitable debates to ensue dur­ing an elec­tion year we can focus on issues and not stoop to expos­ing ver­bal gaffes and sar­to­r­ial faux pas. If you want to crit­i­cize Obama, crit­i­cize him, a con­sti­tu­tional lawyer, for evis­cer­at­ing the 4th Amend­ment with his recent vote on the FISA bill. Or crit­i­cize him for his hawk­ish view on Iran or his votes for emer­gency defense spend­ing more than five years after the ‘emer­gen­cy’, not because he said fifty seven states instead of fifty on the cam­paign trail.
Crit­i­cize McCain for not defend­ing the 4th Amend­ment and not vot­ing on the FISA bill, for vot­ing against an increase in GI ben­e­fits and for vot­ing to con­tin­u­ing emer­gency defense spend­ing five years after the ‘emer­gen­cy’. Don’t crit­i­cize him because he thinks Iraq and Pak­istan share a com­mon bor­der, (a really wide bor­der called Iran). The future of this coun­try is wor­thy of bet­ter debate and time is too short to waste on any­thing less than seri­ous issues.

No blind faith in governance

The US gov­ern­ment was cre­ated by, for and of the peo­ple and oper­ates at the ‘con­sent’ of the gov­erned. Gov­ern­ments pro­vide and main­tain infra­struc­ture and ser­vices for the pub­lic ben­e­fit and are also charged with main­tain­ing order and enforc­ing pub­lic safety. The US Con­sti­tu­tion is designed to ensure gov­ern­ment serve the peo­ple for the pub­lic good with­out also vio­lat­ing cer­tain inalien­able rights of the individual.

Coequal branches of gov­ern­ment, leg­isla­tive, judi­cial and exec­u­tive were estab­lished to pro­tect our civil lib­er­ties from abuses of power by any one branch. Over­sight is a respon­si­bil­ity and right of the pub­lic. In order to par­tic­i­pate in their gov­er­nance and ensure against abuses of power the pub­lic are pro­vided access to pub­lic infor­ma­tion and given oppor­tu­nity to tes­tify and exer­cise their rights.

Elected offi­cials are sworn to uphold the con­sti­tu­tion before enter­ing office nev­er­the­less Con­gress recently passed a bill that evis­cer­ates the fourth amend­ment, relin­quishes its leg­isla­tive author­ity and elim­i­nates court over­sight of wire­tap­ping. If that wasn’t enough, Con­gress removed, retroac­tively, any rights of the cit­i­zen to seek judi­cial rem­edy for war­rant less snoop­ing. Con­gress passed this bill when 70% of the Sen­ate, those not on the Intel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, did not even know what they were grant­ing immu­nity for.

In the words of Ben­jamin Franklin, “They that can give up essen­tial lib­erty for a lit­tle safety deserve nei­ther lib­erty nor safe­ty”. Amer­i­cans are expected to accept on faith, absent any and all trans­parency and under the guise of national secu­rity that the vio­la­tion of our indi­vid­ual pri­vacy is for the pub­lic good.

With­out judi­cial or other over­sight we are expected to believe on faith that those admin­is­ter­ing poli­cies that affect cit­i­zens are both com­pe­tent and qual­i­fied and any results ben­e­fi­cial to the pub­lic good. This is true at the local level as well where lack of trans­parency or dif­fi­culty in obtain­ing pub­lic infor­ma­tion limit over­sight as well.

Recently, an appli­cant for the posi­tion of police chief in Coquille who took the time to research the city took an inter­est in the Leah Free­man case. After read­ing the lim­ited files avail­able online, the appli­cant, a sea­soned inves­ti­ga­tor from Geor­gia believed he could bring some res­o­lu­tion to this eight year old case.

The inves­ti­ga­tor, anx­ious to bring res­o­lu­tion to the fam­ily was will­ing to fly out and work the case for noth­ing more than expenses. To that end, he wrote DA, Paul Frasier, cited his cre­den­tials and requested an oppor­tu­nity to view the case files to assist in solv­ing this mur­der. Frasier denied his request cit­ing secrecy in the case.

Sadly, locally just as nation­ally, the pub­lic are pro­hib­ited from assess­ing the com­pe­tence and progress of their paid pub­lic ser­vants. We are all too often expected to accept on faith that the jobs we are pay­ing for are being admin­is­tered cor­rectly, com­pe­tently and to the ben­e­fit of the pub­lic at large despite a lack of results or sup­port­ing evidence.

FISA — Senate forgives Nixon">Countdown — FISA — Senate forgives Nixon

Rachel Mad­dow dis­cusses the Sen­ate action on FISA

What if Con­gress had responded to Water­gate by immu­niz­ing the exec­u­tive branch’s law­break­ers and giv­ing Richard Nixon sweep­ing new pow­ers to snoop?

Oh, wait! They just did! They just took thirty years or so to get around to it.”

Video from Raw­story

They that can give up essen­tial lib­erty to obtain a lit­tle tem­po­rary safety deserve nei­ther lib­erty nor safety”. Ben­jamin Franklin

FISA and telecom immunity">Feingold on FISA and telecom immunity

Fein­gold speaks to urge Con­gress to sup­port the Dodd amend­ment and strike tele­com immu­nity from the bill.

Video from Raw­story

NSA on the line?">Was that the NSA on the line?

While being inter­viewed by a for­eign jour­nal­ist today it was hard not to notice the echo on the phone line. Sad that we are freely tapped with­out any regard for our pri­vacy and while I can’t say for sure that was the rea­son, I have had over­seas calls absent the elec­tronic feedback.

FISA bill">House denies retroactive immunity on FISA bill

It was close, 217–197 but the House man­aged to pass a bill that does not include retroac­tive immu­nity for tele­coms involved in ille­gal wire­tap­ping. Pres­i­dent Bush has promised to dig in his heels and veto any bill not includ­ing immu­nity. Nev­er­the­less, a big thank you to those who got this bill passed as is.

Blu­me­naur, DeFazio and Wu voted Yea, Hoo­ley did not vote and Walden voted with the GOP and voted Nay.

Colbert pushes the bin Laden telemarket

Tran­script at Raw­story

US mail being opened without warrants">US mail being opened without warrants

Appar­ently our domes­tic mail has been opened with­out ben­e­fit of war­rants need­ing only the approval of the US Postal Inspec­tion Ser­vice Direc­tor. Each day our free­doms erode fur­ther and fur­ther and we can thank the extended use of sign­ing state­ments for some of it.

There’s rea­son to believe more mail may be being opened, as well.

In late 2006, a sign­ing state­ment issued by Pres­i­dent Bush sug­gested that his office had expanded exec­u­tive branch power to open mail with­out a warrant.

The sign­ing state­ment accom­pa­nied H.R. 6407, the Postal Account­abil­ity and Enhance­ment Act of 2006, which reit­er­ated a pro­hi­bi­tion on open­ing first class mail with­out a warrant.

In 1996, the postal reg­u­la­tions were altered to per­mit the open­ing of First Class mail with­out a war­rant in nar­rowly defined cases where the Postal Inspec­tor believes there is a cred­i­ble threat that the pack­age con­tains dan­ger­ous mate­r­ial like bombs,” the ACLU said in a press release at the time. “Instead of ref­er­enc­ing the nar­row excep­tion in the postal reg­u­la­tions, the president’s sign­ing state­ment sug­gests that he is assum­ing broader author­ity to open mail with­out a warrant.”