All Posts Tagged With: "Warrantless snooping"
Maddow — Whistleblower speaks about why he told of illegal wiretaps
US energy needs by 2030">Wind to meet 20% US energy needs by 2030
Recognizing the importance of addressing the climate change crisis and reducing dependence upon foreign oil and gas, the US Department of Energy (USDOE) has launched an aggressive program aiming to meet 20% of America’s energy needs via wind by 2030. In conjunction with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), the USDOE produced a study assessing the economic and environmental costs and benefits of achieving this goal.
The study can be read in its entirety at 20percentwind.org and concludes more than 500,000 jobs would be supported with an increase of 100,000 jobs in supporting industries and 200,000 more jobs through economic expansion at the local level. Other economic gains are expected annual property tax increases of $1.5B by 2030 and electric price stability.
Deploying wind energy and displacing fossil fuel powered plants will result in 825 million metric tons less carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2030. Power generation presently accounts for 40% of CO2 emissions in the US. Wind energy, unlike fossil fuel or nuclear generated power does not require water so water consumption will drop also.
The study focuses entirely on centralized wind energy or large wind farms despite growing and successful implementation of distributed renewable energy systems in Europe. Nevertheless, the study reveals that successful deployment of an additional 304GW of wind power to meet the 20% goal is dependent upon massive investment in the transmission grid infrastructure. Consequently, 19,000 miles of new 765-kilovolt (kV) transmission lines, for an estimated price tag of US $60 billion are being proposed to Congress by high powered energy players like T Boone Pickens.
Other challenges to the centralized model include the need to develop larger electric load balancing areas, in tandem with better regional planning to implement generation diversity. According to the study, the US must increase annual wind power installation by 16GW by 2018, within ten years. Obtaining permits from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other affected agencies in order to build out the transmission infrastructure to support this growth can take up to ten years. This is one reason the European Distributed Energy Partnership (EUDEEP) formed to implement wide scale distributed energy production to avoid many of these barriers and costs.
Significantly, the study acknowledges that a “business-as-usual†approach will not meet these goals. A major national commitment to clean energy, CO2 reductions and independence from foreign resources is required at a grass roots level. From a grass roots level it will also be possible to demonstrate that wide scale distributed energy systems can work in the US not just Europe and elsewhere. Happily, there are several people working on making the South Coast of Oregon a model of energy independence that the rest of the nation can build upon.
Please permit me a little divergence from topic here but I hope that in the inevitable debates to ensue during an election year we can focus on issues and not stoop to exposing verbal gaffes and sartorial faux pas. If you want to criticize Obama, criticize him, a constitutional lawyer, for eviscerating the 4th Amendment with his recent vote on the FISA bill. Or criticize him for his hawkish view on Iran or his votes for emergency defense spending more than five years after the ‘emergency’, not because he said fifty seven states instead of fifty on the campaign trail.
Criticize McCain for not defending the 4th Amendment and not voting on the FISA bill, for voting against an increase in GI benefits and for voting to continuing emergency defense spending five years after the ‘emergency’. Don’t criticize him because he thinks Iraq and Pakistan share a common border, (a really wide border called Iran). The future of this country is worthy of better debate and time is too short to waste on anything less than serious issues.
No blind faith in governance
The US government was created by, for and of the people and operates at the ‘consent’ of the governed. Governments provide and maintain infrastructure and services for the public benefit and are also charged with maintaining order and enforcing public safety. The US Constitution is designed to ensure government serve the people for the public good without also violating certain inalienable rights of the individual.
Coequal branches of government, legislative, judicial and executive were established to protect our civil liberties from abuses of power by any one branch. Oversight is a responsibility and right of the public. In order to participate in their governance and ensure against abuses of power the public are provided access to public information and given opportunity to testify and exercise their rights.
Elected officials are sworn to uphold the constitution before entering office nevertheless Congress recently passed a bill that eviscerates the fourth amendment, relinquishes its legislative authority and eliminates court oversight of wiretapping. If that wasn’t enough, Congress removed, retroactively, any rights of the citizen to seek judicial remedy for warrant less snooping. Congress passed this bill when 70% of the Senate, those not on the Intelligence Committee, did not even know what they were granting immunity for.
In the words of Benjamin Franklin, “They that can give up essential liberty for a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safetyâ€. Americans are expected to accept on faith, absent any and all transparency and under the guise of national security that the violation of our individual privacy is for the public good.
Without judicial or other oversight we are expected to believe on faith that those administering policies that affect citizens are both competent and qualified and any results beneficial to the public good. This is true at the local level as well where lack of transparency or difficulty in obtaining public information limit oversight as well.
Recently, an applicant for the position of police chief in Coquille who took the time to research the city took an interest in the Leah Freeman case. After reading the limited files available online, the applicant, a seasoned investigator from Georgia believed he could bring some resolution to this eight year old case.
The investigator, anxious to bring resolution to the family was willing to fly out and work the case for nothing more than expenses. To that end, he wrote DA, Paul Frasier, cited his credentials and requested an opportunity to view the case files to assist in solving this murder. Frasier denied his request citing secrecy in the case.
Sadly, locally just as nationally, the public are prohibited from assessing the competence and progress of their paid public servants. We are all too often expected to accept on faith that the jobs we are paying for are being administered correctly, competently and to the benefit of the public at large despite a lack of results or supporting evidence.
FISA — Senate forgives Nixon">Countdown — FISA — Senate forgives Nixon
Rachel Maddow discusses the Senate action on FISA
“What if Congress had responded to Watergate by immunizing the executive branch’s lawbreakers and giving Richard Nixon sweeping new powers to snoop?
“Oh, wait! They just did! They just took thirty years or so to get around to it.”
Video from Rawstory
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety”. Benjamin Franklin
FISA and telecom immunity">Feingold on FISA and telecom immunity
Feingold speaks to urge Congress to support the Dodd amendment and strike telecom immunity from the bill.
Video from Rawstory
NSA on the line?">Was that the NSA on the line?
While being interviewed by a foreign journalist today it was hard not to notice the echo on the phone line. Sad that we are freely tapped without any regard for our privacy and while I can’t say for sure that was the reason, I have had overseas calls absent the electronic feedback.
FISA bill">House denies retroactive immunity on FISA bill
It was close, 217–197 but the House managed to pass a bill that does not include retroactive immunity for telecoms involved in illegal wiretapping. President Bush has promised to dig in his heels and veto any bill not including immunity. Nevertheless, a big thank you to those who got this bill passed as is.
Blumenaur, DeFazio and Wu voted Yea, Hooley did not vote and Walden voted with the GOP and voted Nay.
Colbert pushes the bin Laden telemarket
Transcript at Rawstory
US mail being opened without warrants">US mail being opened without warrants
Apparently our domestic mail has been opened without benefit of warrants needing only the approval of the US Postal Inspection Service Director. Each day our freedoms erode further and further and we can thank the extended use of signing statements for some of it.
There’s reason to believe more mail may be being opened, as well.
In late 2006, a signing statement issued by President Bush suggested that his office had expanded executive branch power to open mail without a warrant.
The signing statement accompanied H.R. 6407, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006, which reiterated a prohibition on opening first class mail without a warrant.
“In 1996, the postal regulations were altered to permit the opening of First Class mail without a warrant in narrowly defined cases where the Postal Inspector believes there is a credible threat that the package contains dangerous material like bombs,” the ACLU said in a press release at the time. “Instead of referencing the narrow exception in the postal regulations, the president’s signing statement suggests that he is assuming broader authority to open mail without a warrant.”

